Cyber breaches rarely begin with complex code or sophisticated attackers. They often start with everyday decisions. A distracted employee clicks a suspicious link. A manager shares login credentials over WhatsApp. Someone turns off multi-factor authentication because it feels like a hassle. These are not technical failures but cultural ones. Habits, assumptions, and behaviours that quietly undermine even the strongest cybersecurity systems.
In the first quarter of 2025, Nigeria recorded over 119,000 data breaches. But the real story is not in the numbers. It is in what those breaches reveal. A widespread gap exists between the cybersecurity policies organisations put in place and the everyday behaviours they tolerate.
Policies are written, tools are deployed, and training is conducted. Yet none of it matters if the organisational culture does not support secure behaviour. When teams prioritise speed over caution, employees see cybersecurity as someone else’s job, and leaders fail to model what they expect, the entire system becomes vulnerable.
Culture is the weakest link because it cannot be patched or programmed. It is shaped by what is rewarded, ignored, or excused. It is rarely visible until it breaks, and no technology or policy can hold the line once it breaks. This is the silent risk many organisations overlook, and it is the one that can cause the most lasting damage.
What Culture Means in Cyber Governance
Culture is often described as what people do when no one is watching. In cybersecurity governance, it is the unspoken force that shapes behaviour. It influences how employees treat policies, handle sensitive data, raise concerns, or ignore them.
Governance frameworks outline what should happen, while culture decides what happens in real time. An organisation might be ISO 27001 certified, run regular audits, and invest in advanced security tools. Yet the entire governance structure becomes superficial if employees casually share passwords, dismiss phishing simulations as a joke, or discourage colleagues from reporting violations.
Culture plays a critical role in how an organisation manages cybersecurity risks. When security is woven into everyday decisions and embraced by employees, the organisation becomes more resilient and responsive. But when the culture is weak, neglected, or even hostile to security, it creates more vulnerabilities and weakens overall risk management.
So, where does this culture come from, and who sets the tone? The answer is simple. It starts at the top. Leadership not only manages cyber risk but also shapes a culture where secure behaviour is expected, supported, and sustained.
Leadership as the First Line of Governance
Leadership is more than a stakeholder in cybersecurity. It is the driving force shaping how seriously the entire organisation treats cyber risk. When executives actively prioritise cybersecurity, employees are more likely to follow suit, but when leaders sidestep security practices or treat them as an afterthought, they signal that security is not a shared responsibility.
The consequences of poor cyber culture at the top became evident in January 2025 when Insight Partners, a global investment firm, suffered a sophisticated social engineering breach. Despite having industry-standard defences, attackers gained access to sensitive investor and portfolio company data by exploiting human trust, not technology. The breach exposed gaps in verification protocols and revealed how even well-resourced organisations remain vulnerable when their culture does not enforce vigilance across every level, including leadership.
Recent findings from the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity support this view. Most cyber incidents are traced not to system flaws but internal behavioural lapses. These include poor decision-making, inconsistent practices, and the failure to follow basic protocols. Many of these issues stem from cultures where cybersecurity policies exist but are not reinforced or modelled by leadership.
In Nigeria, where frameworks like the NDPR and ISO 27001 are increasingly adopted, there remains a gap between documented compliance and real-time accountability. Executive teams may fund cybersecurity tools and receive quarterly updates, but some still skip security training or use unsecured channels for communication. These oversights weaken culture from the top down.
By contrast, organisations with active leadership engagement experience better outcomes. The 2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report shows that visible executive involvement improves breach detection times and strengthens department compliance. A secure culture grows when leaders set the tone through action, participate in drills, prioritise transparency, and reinforce security as a shared value. Until leaders see themselves as culture shapers and not just risk owners, every technical control will rest on a shaky foundation.
Cultural Misalignments that Erode Cyber Governance
Some of the most damaging cybersecurity risks do not come from hackers or faulty systems. They stem from quiet misalignments in behaviour, mindset, and organisational priorities. These cultural gaps may seem minor, but they weaken cyber governance and increase vulnerability over time.
Common examples include:
- “Security is IT’s job.” Employees disengage, believing they aren’t accountable.
- “Move fast, fix later.” This leads teams to bypass controls under pressure to meet performance KPIs.
- “Don’t escalate; it’s not that serious.” This mindset fosters a culture of silence that discourages early risk detection and transparency.
- Checkbox culture. Awareness training is seen as a ritual or a checklist, not an education.
These mindsets leave cracks in the organisation’s foundation that attackers are happy to exploit. However, cultural gaps can be addressed and even reversed through intentional action.
Aligning Culture with Cyber Governance Goals
Shifting an organisation’s culture does not happen overnight. However, it is one of the most critical steps in building resilient cyber governance. To create a culture that sustains strong governance, security must be embedded into the organisation’s language, leadership, and daily experience. The goal is not just compliance but genuine commitment.
Below are five high-impact actions that help close the gap between policy and everyday behaviour:
1, Embed Security into Onboarding and Everyday Language
Make cybersecurity a core part of new employee orientation. From Day 1, employees should understand why security matters, not just what policies exist. Go beyond policy documents. Use real-world examples, role-based scenarios, and plain language. When security becomes part of how people talk and work, culture shifts from passive to proactive.
2, Reward and Recognise Secure Behaviour
What gets recognised gets repeated. Celebrate employees who spot phishing emails, suggest control improvements, or consistently model secure practices. Whether it’s shout-outs in team meetings, leaderboard recognition, or tangible rewards, these small acts of acknowledgement help normalise good cyber hygiene and encourage a culture of participation rather than policing.
3, Leadership Must Model the Standard
If leadership doesn’t walk the talk, the culture won’t either. People replicate what leaders prioritise. Leaders must visibly prioritise cybersecurity, participate in training, follow protocols, and speak regularly about cyber risk. Reinforcing that security is everyone’s responsibility. Culture flows from the top. When leaders treat security as essential, not optional, everyone else follows suit.
4, Create Cross-Functional Security Champions
Cyber risk isn’t confined to IT. Empower employees from across departments like HR, Finance, Marketing, and Operations to act as Security Champions. These ambassadors bridge the gap between centralised security teams and daily operations, helping tailor best practices to their teams, escalating concerns, and promoting shared ownership. They are the cultural glue that binds policies to people. Security Champions improve local policy ownership and foster collaboration beyond the GRC or IT unit.
5, Make Security Personal
Cybersecurity should feel relevant, not abstract. Policies should be connected to real-life consequences, such as identity theft, lost revenue, and reputational harm. Organisations should encourage habits like enabling multi-factor authentication, using password managers, and locking screens. Protocols should be intuitive, not burdensome. When people understand why something matters and can easily act on it, they become active participants in protecting the organisation.
All of these efforts point to one simple truth. Culture is not optional. It is the foundation of effective cyber governance.
Conclusion
Cyber governance is not only about technology, policies, or compliance. It is about people, their choices when no one is watching, and the behaviours that quietly shape an organisation’s exposure to risk. You can invest in world-class firewalls and threat detection tools and draft policies that meet every regulatory standard, but if the culture does not support secure thinking and action, those investments remain fragile.
Leaders must set the tone. Employees must see security as part of their role, and organisations must treat culture as the foundation of cyber governance, not a footnote. If the culture is strong, the system holds. If it is not, the system breaks from within.
pcl. can help organisations move beyond technical fixes by embedding cybersecurity into culture, leadership, and daily operations. Through behavioural assessments, leadership alignment, awareness redesign, and cross-functional champion programmes, pcl. supports clients in turning security from a checklist into a shared mindset, because in the end, lasting cyber resilience is not built on tools alone but on cultures that think and act securely by default.
Written by:
Onyinyechukwu Kene-Mbuba
DTC